The Real Data Science: Tables--So What?
My Presentation to Silicon Valley SQL Server User Group
6:30 PM, Tuesday, September 15, 2015
Microsoft
1065 La Avenida Building 1
Mountain View, CA
Free and open to the public (+ pizza)
For details and RSVP see Meetup
1. Quote of the Week
[Do] formalized languages need the definition of data types? Up to now I have not read strong arguments against my statement that for interpretation and operation on data the use of character strings is sufficient when
2. To Laugh or Cry?
- All data are expressed as character strings that are explicitly based in language communities, whereas the character strings denote concepts that are represented by UID's;
- The denoted concepts are defined by their supertype concepts (among others);
- Collections of allowed qualitative concepts (that are denoted by string values or value ranges) are defined to enable the specification of constraints; --LinkedIn.com
- There is no Such Thing as Object-Relational Impedance Mismatch
- SQL for Beginners in a Nutshell [Infographic]
3. Online Debunkings
- Orthodoxy versus the Data Management Reformation
- Back to Basics
- How to enforce a constraint over multiple tables
4. Elsewhere
Which technologies emerge from the abyss
Why Big Data gets it Wrong
5. Housekeeping Added to LINKS page:
- Query Optimization
- Relational Algebra
- LEAP RDBMS
- Relational
- Relational Algebra Translator
- System for Translating Relational Algebra Scripts into Microsoft SQL Server SQL Scripts
- System for Translating Relational Algebra Scripts into Oracle SQL Scripts
- The Case For Teaching Ignorance
- Tech nightmares that keep Turing Award winners up at night
- New @The PostWest
No comments:
Post a Comment