Note: This is 07/30/17 rewrite of a 11/11/12 post to bring it line with McGoveran formal exposition of Codd's real RDM [1] and its interpretation.
There is nothing wrong per se with the question in last week's picture, namely:
"Can I ask whether people make use of the functionality provided by the database to ensure adequate data quality. Secondly do people apply this retrospectively as seems quite reasonable to me when a data problem is identified and the source data cleaned up--to do so could prevent future errors. There appears to be a tension between this sort of implementation and at least a perception of flexibility as database changes would be required should additional allowable values be required." --LinkedIn.comexcept that it's about time such questions are no longer asked. Unfortunately, they are evidence of the persistent lack of foundation knowledge in the industry for more than five decades. Such knowledge would have obviated such questions.